A married woman has a one-night stand with a lustful photographer while on vacation, and soon cannot escape her past mistake when the photographer follows her home and wants to continue his lustful fling with her at any cost. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Tum: A Dangerous Obsession
A married woman has a one-night stand with a lustful photographer while on vacation, and soon cannot escape her past mistake when the photographer follows her home and wants to continue his lustful fling with her at any cost.
You may also like
Tum: A Dangerous Obsession torrent reviews
Howard F (br) wrote: Just OK. The scene of Coco and Boy dancing in the casino was the emotional turning point. Lovely. To watch Coco watch others--more their fabrics and outfits than them--was interesting. But way too much foreshadowing toward the end. Enough already.
leyah k (ag) wrote: I like thisI love this
Vahni T (fr) wrote: Undeniably funny, and a good action movie.
Nuno L (ag) wrote: Ce film est le cauchemar ultime, l'horreur absolue ! Ames sensibles s'abstenir, mais vraiment ! Oo ... putain !
Tyler S (jp) wrote: This movie is dated only 10 years later and Deniro is wasted in this cheesy thriller with an average performance from Kinnear and a terrible one from Stamos...film just didn't make any sense and had absolutely ZERO thrills to be offered.
MEC r (au) wrote: This movie is ok. Nothing that spectacular though.
Nikki M (it) wrote: i acually liked this movie but i hate that fact that they never caught that fucked up barber and the one that new it was the barber they killied him that pissed me off
Luis C (fr) wrote: I Loved this picture
Jose M (es) wrote: Irredeemably bad, the most offensive thing the film shows is the bad stunts and special effects. Then again, the people are so dull and inept, for they stand and do nothing, thus being easy targets for the ninja. The movie is funny at some parts, but overall, it's horrible. I'm pretty sure no one (in my profile) will see this movie. Offensively awful, it's almost close to being a guilty pleasure.
Lucas G (ru) wrote: Awesome pace and dialogue; The only thing that was a little offbeat was the casting. Although they are great actors, it's REALLY hard to believe they're college undergrads.
Martin T (fr) wrote: There's no glossing over the film's shortcomings. The effects are cheap, the science is preposterous, the dialogue is bad, and Marshall Thompson is a poor man's Sterling Hayden. But it's ridiculous fun perfect for a lazy Sunday afternoon. The shorter a movie is, the more forgiving I tend to be. Predictable, yes, but in a comforting way. The cinematography is also much better than one would expect.
Vera H (au) wrote: The chemistry between Tracy and Hepburn was so palpable at some parts that I felt thoroughly cheated when there wasn't a kiss to seal the deal at the end of the movie... But I guess that's just a testament to how much I was drawn in by these characters.
Jimmy G (au) wrote: 10/10 must recommend
Heather M (ru) wrote: This had a lot of potential, but the story was not well developed and the characters were weak. I did like the watercolor depictions at the end of the movie.