Untraceable

Untraceable

Special Agent Jennifer Marsh (Diane Lane) works in an elite division of the FBI dedicated to fighting cybercrime. She thinks she has seen it all, until a particularly sadistic criminal arises on the Internet. This tech-savvy killer posts live feeds of his crimes on his website; the more hits the site gets, the faster the victim dies. Marsh and her team must find the elusive killer before time runs out.

Special Agent Jennifer Marsh (Diane Lane) works in an elite division of the FBI dedicated to fighting cybercrime. She thinks she has seen it all, until one day she is tasked with hunting down a seemingly untraceable serial killer who posts live videos of his victims on the Internet. As time runs out, the cat and mouse chase becomes more personal. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Untraceable torrent reviews

David S (ca) wrote: Sad, boring, depressing movie. It started slow and finished slow. I kept waiting for it to get better, but it never did. The young mans (son, nephew) acting was good, the the rest was below par. I've very rarely rated a movie 1 star, but this movie is terrible. Two other people that watched it with me agreed.

WS W (de) wrote: I believe it tried to make a point here- but in a very hardcore, spoon-feeding way, on top of those terrible, amateurish directing, writing, acting & production.

Lanky Man P (fr) wrote: There really isn't much that is good about this film.

Andruw F (fr) wrote: It loses steam halfway through because the second half is really bad, especially compared to the first. Paul Rudd and Jason Segel give great performances that are really funny and make the movie better, because the writing is fine, but a lot of moments were funnier than they should have been. I agree with the consensus because I felt like they mostly used the very simple plot well and got a lot out of it. I think my only real huge complaint is the second half. I've seen this several times and it holds up, but not as a favorite, or for multiple viewings a year.

Skyler B (ca) wrote: George Clooney, you ol' bastard! You've entertained me again!

Stefano C (de) wrote: Inferiore agli altri due capitoli e piuttosto confuso, ma nel complesso comunque godibile e realizzato con la consueta cura

Dana F (it) wrote: Not nearly as disturbing as it should have been. This movie is "Dahmer Lite". There are some tense moments but this movie barely tipped the iceberg of the atrocities Dahmer committed, and suffers accordingly. I also think the non-linear narrative did not do it any favors. The main reason to watch this movie is Renner's performance which is fantastic. He brings a true eeriness to the role, even with the limitations of the watered-down story.

Ida L (jp) wrote: I funny movie. Quite ok to watch.

Dax S (mx) wrote: I enjoyed this movie a lot as a kid.

Chris B (ag) wrote: My fave movie of all time and made me want to see every Don Cheadle movie ever made. Awesome true story.

Mark S (ag) wrote: Loved the protagonists - liked the antagonists - hated the soundtrack.

Jared C (kr) wrote: Total Nonstop Crashing!!

GColby P (us) wrote: One of the dumbest spoofs I've ever seen

gary t (au) wrote: WOW......WOW.....WOW.....SO SO SO SO SO BAD......MAN THIS IS SUCH AN AWFUL MESSY MESSY MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SO SO SO SO DREADFUL, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SO SO SO AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SO SO SO DREADFUL, IT IS SO SO SO DREADFUL, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MESSY MOVIE 2 WATCH.......WARNING THIS MOVIE CONTAINS STROBE LIGHTNING EFFECTS THROUGHOUT THIS MOVIE......MAN THIS IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MESSY MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SUCH AN AWFUL MOVIE 2 WATCH, IT IS SUCH A BAD MOVIE 2 WATCH, JUST AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL IT IS SUCH A BAD MOVIE 2 WATCH, JUST AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL COSTS IT IS THAT BAD.....JUST DO NOT WATCH THIS MOVIE IT IS SO AWFUL.......ITS GOT A GOOD SOUNDTRACK THROUGHOUT THIS MOVIE.....BUT MAN THIS MOVIE IS SO SO SO AWFUL 2 WATCH...

YUNG S (ru) wrote: Love this movie it's one of Arnold's best.

Gimly M (ru) wrote: At a paltry(!) 2 hours and 35 minutes, this may just be the shortest Costner film ever. It's just the Costnerisation of the Robin Hood story, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Jens S (us) wrote: The premise is fun, making you think of 70s WW2 caper movies. I don't know how they managed to combine such a fantastic cast and yet make every single character and actor feel underused. The decision to split up the team didn't help. The direction and look of the film are great and there are glimpses of what could have been. But the plot remains somewhat undecided, sometimes hinting at the terrors of war while being entirely unexciting at the same time. Entertaining but also a missed opportunity. Pity.

Shawn R (kr) wrote: Very interested idea for a movie but something did not work.

Andrew S (us) wrote: Chris Wilton, a young tennis instructor, becomes involved with a wealthy family, one member of which he's giving tennis lessons to. This leads to his rise in the world of upper class people and his subsequent romantic involvement with two women. A clandestine affair follows, leading him into an ever deepening quagmire until the only way out for him is to contemplate doing away with one of the women.