Werewolf of London

Werewolf of London

A strange animal attack turns a botanist into a bloodthirsty monster.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:75 minutes
  • Release:1935
  • Language:English,Cantonese,Latin
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:moon,   murder,   jealousy,  

The juice of a rare Tibetan flower is the only thing that keeps Dr. Glendon from turning into a werewolf during a full moon. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Werewolf of London torrent reviews

Revolver O (it) wrote: The rat becomes dangerous when it's trapped in a corner, because it's the only solution it has. And that's exactly what happens here when Shamoto, the main character, knows he lost everything he has ever had, one way or another. A mix between drama, thriller, horror, splatter and sexual components, wonderfully acted and directed

Wayne T (au) wrote: Good story, bad director

John C (es) wrote: dissapointing... but at the same time a bit fun adventure...

Jose Miguel G (au) wrote: It lacks the clever satire elements of the previous two, but it closes the trilogy with a good slasher feel.

Everett J (fr) wrote: L?Humanitwritten and directed by Bruno Dumontstarring Emmanuel Schott, Sverine Caneele, Philippe Tullier, Ghislain Ghesqure, Ginette AllegreEmploying extended takes, a static camera, and deliberate pacing this film explores the language of horror and acute grief.A young girl has been found dead in a field; she has been raped and bitten on the throat. Police Superintendent Pharaon De Winter (Schott) is beginning the arduous task of gathering clues to determine who is responsible for the crime. His investigation leads him to the school bus the girl, named Nadege, rode for the last time as well as a mental hospital.The pacing of the film is exceedingly deliberate as it allows the audience to pause and look at things for a great length of time. It focuses its attention on the faces of the characters and stays on them to allow the viewer to examine their micro-emotions to help determine their real feelings regarding whatever is troubling.De Winter is beset with grief for pretty much the entire film. He looks worn, tired, and anguished over what he has seen. Indeed, he cannot let go of it; it haunts him wherever he turns. He seems particularly disturbed whenever he sees girls the same age as Nadege out on the street. He routinely pauses to stare at them for what amounts to an uncomfortable amount of time. Of course one cannot get inside his head but there are many possibilities as to why he lingers on the children and not all of them are decent. Still, one should not expect the worst in this case because there is no other evidence in the film to corroborate it. De Winter also has a habit of rubbing his face against the faces of other men. He does it with a man being interrogated, a doctor at the mental institution, and with the man who committed the deed. For the last one he goes further and kisses him strangely on the mouth. It doesn?t make any sense in the context of the film other than to display the pent up emotions that are welling up inside him. At one point in the film De Winter screams repeatedly after walking past the place where it happened. Domino (Caneele) is a neighbor of De Winter?s and they are close friends. De Winter is gravely attracted to Domino and there is much tension between them from the beginning of the film although Domino shows no obvious signs of interest. Domino is dating Joseph (Tullier), a sour school bus driver with a foul mouth and surly disposition. .Each scene features extended takes that explore the limitations of cinema with a rather documentary style. The camera is stationary for much of the film as all action is reduced to taking place within the frame. There are scenes where characters are moving from one place to another and the camera will show the entire journey from a few different angles. The film becomes a contemplation during these scenes as the viewer is allowed the opportunity to think about the nature of the film and existential queries that have developed. There are many such questions. What is the anatomy of sorrow? Is grief a sickness and is there an immediate cure? Is it possible to not sexualize the rape and murder of an eleven year old girl? De Winter is fraught with anxiety for the entire duration of the film. He finds it difficult, if not impossible, to work through his feelings regarding the girl?s murder. Indeed, his breathing is often heavy and shallow, he is testy with his mother, and he is taunted by the relationship between Domino and Joseph. He doesn?t let it show very often but he is exceedingly attracted to Domino and this upsets him deeply. During one scene Domino decides to initiate some physical contact with De Winter. She tells him that he can touch her wherever he wants and proceeds to digitally penetrate herself. De Winter appears disgusted and promptly walks out leaving Domino to contemplate the cruelty of her act. There are several sex scenes between Domino and Joseph that seem entirely out of place in this film; they are fairly graphic and animalistic. They don?t do anything to further the narrative and seem altogether gratuitous. There are many scenes that feature female genitals. There is the close up of the young girl?s sexual organs, the three sex scenes, a close up of Domino on her back with her legs spread and finally, the insertion of the finger into the vagina. One cannot help but wonder after the motivation for such scenes. It?s impossible to come up with a justification for such moments because there isn?t one. Naughty bits in cinema only work when the are directly related to the story being told. Here they just are, by themselves, apparently shown to demonstrate that Joseph has a healthy sexual appetite. Otherwise they serve no purpose. There are moments of sheer, unadulterated beauty throughout this film. It?s filmed in relatively flat terrain and it allows the viewer to take in the boundless, seemingly infinite horizons that seem to go on forever. This openness works very well throughout the film to articulate the impossibility to contain the death of the girl and to make much sense of it. It is scattered across the sky and one cannot fully grasp it because it defies explanation. How does one explain the horrible, brutal death of an eleven year old girl? There are no words that allow most of us to comprehend the severity of the act. Of course when one thinks about the needs and desires of the one who committed the crime, then it becomes easier to understand. One can gain insight when one can see the deed itself through his eyes and work through his mind to process it as it occurs without any moral hand wringing. As this has proven to be impossible for most persons it remains thoroughly experimental at this stage.The film plays like a tone poem to the many facets of despair. The camera hovers agonizingly over the faces of the characters articulating a deeply felt and overbearing torment that informs the girl?s horrific death with tremendous sadness. Specifically, there are numerous shots of De Winter?s face that clearly show his fragile emotional state as he attempts to come to terms with the crime. He occasionally hides his face in his hands as if he cannot bear the burden of knowing that such a thing is possible and that it could happen to such a bubbly, lovely creature who has given no cause to be treated so barbarically. The performances in this film are natural and believable. Emmanuel Schott captures his character?s overarching loneliness and grief with an admirable clarity. De Winter is a wholly sympathetic character who Schott deftly conveys with warmth and tremendous calm. Sverine Caneele possesses a quiet dignity throughout the film. Her character comes off as knowing and terribly understanding. Philippe Tullier gives us a terminally crass character who is often shown to be uncouth and slightly unhinged.Overall, this is a devastatingly mournful film that seeps into the skin and remains there long after the film has concluded. There is a coldness about it, almost clinical, that is rooted in the sense of loss that is readily felt from the beginning. It shows how terrible things can leave a lasting impression on those whose job it is to deal with the aftermath while struggling to maintain their sense of personal order. De Winter is simply a man whose nature is such that crimes of this sort do not simply wash over him. He is the type that is haunted by such cruelties and therefore susceptible to emotional strain that plays on him routinely and keeps him menacingly by the throat.

Cadesia G (au) wrote: Best movie ever on disneyyyyyy:)

Alan V (mx) wrote: Norris + Frankenstein + stealing from "Halloween" and "The Shining + the pacing of a movie 10 years older = rough going.

Archana B (fr) wrote: Gulluji's best ever comedy movie!

Adam R (us) wrote: Putney Swope has a free form experimental style that makes it entertaining. There are some good lines of dialogue, and as a satire, the film examines racism, corrupt morals, and commercialization. I found it to be uneven and lowbrow, but am glad I watched it.

Cecily B (us) wrote: Interesting movie. I am assuming they are talking about Borderline Personality Disorder in this movie, at least that is what it seemed like when I watched it. I have done a lot of research on the topic and it kind of made me sad to see it acted out. Great movie though! (French with Subtitles.)

Nils R (nl) wrote: In 1924, a Soviet delegation apparently went to Mars, where they with accordeon-playing and revolutionary slogans excited the enslaved Martians into beating down their aristocratic oppressors. This story is told in a rambling and incoherent way, with an incomprehensible subplot involving rationing cards. But in the Martian bits the decor and costumes are amazing and make this first (but not last) Soviet SF epic great fun to watch.

Mloy X (ag) wrote: Theodore (Joaquin Phoenix): Sometimes I think I have felt everything I'm ever gonna feel. And from here on out, I'm not gonna feel anything new. Just lesser versions of what I've already felt.This was a really intriguing film; although the subject is quite topical especially with the significant advancement in technology, especially VR-related technology in recent years and the advent of ultra-realistic androids just over the horizon, this film is not so far fetch. Granted, the film isn't really a novel idea since I'm pretty sure there was either (or both) an Outer Limits or Twilight Zone episode out there that dealt with a similar subject. But overall, the film was excellent, Joaquin Phoenix, as strange as he is now, is still a very credible and outstanding actor.

David D (kr) wrote: Amusing and affectionate send-up of '50s alien movies starts out creepy but soon becomes embraceable. Some strange performances (Diana Scarwid in particular) but overall a charming film.