With a Girl of Himalaya

With a Girl of Himalaya

A Korean executive ventures into the Himalayas to visit a family in a small mountain village, where time seems to have stood still for 100 years.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:95 minutes
  • Release:2008
  • Language:Korean,English,Nepali
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:mountain,   death,   animal,  

A Korean executive ventures into the Himalayas in order to deliver the remains of a Nepalese migrant worker to his family. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


With a Girl of Himalaya torrent reviews

Vanessa D (fr) wrote: It was ok and kinda piggy...lol

Justin C (au) wrote: A lot funnier than I was expecting. Seemed like everyone had a good time making the film. If I did one thing to improve the movie I would replace Posey with Tina Fey...Posey came off a bit flat.

Russ B (de) wrote: 1/2/2015: An ok movie. A decent story and Danes is great!

Faley A (ca) wrote: Its an unbelievably incredible true story of surviving a holocaust for a Jew, movie was excellent.. cinematography and everything in it..and its honest and humored enough...enjoyed the show.

James R (ca) wrote: A interesting prequel to the first Zulu film.

Richard U (ru) wrote: Very well made movie, for it will keep you on the edge of your set.

Andrew B (it) wrote: From a critical standpoint, it's bad, but first let's take a look at the good. The soundtrack fits in pretty well, the atmosphere is near perfect, well casted actors that portray their book counterpart really well, great atmosphere, and death that is the way in which William Golding intended it to be(in the novel). However these are the only positives I can see in this movie. I would consider myself a critic, I judge the novels I read and the movies I watch. And I'm pretty merciful in this regard. The novel The Lord of the Flies has a darker tone, distopian society, colorful symbolism, and a well deployed plot with the theme "A man's heart is truly evil". (and now for the wolf to blow the straw house down) Now in contrast of the movie, it gets the theme right. Just one major difference, the book develops the characters into the bad guys, this movie has "the bad guys" without any development. And my gosh, the character development in this movie in short... Has none. All the characters, plot, setting just feel so rushed.. The book took place over at least a couple of months, but in this movie, a few days. Do you honestly want me to believe that the characters turn into murderers in roughly one week? Sorry to bash the characters but seriously some are pointless. Some of the major characters in the book are completely forgotten in this movie, in regards of their names, and the way the reader was supposed too see them. characters that we should at least feel entitled to remember there names for people who haven't read the book. There is also a completely pointless character in the movie who is sick and we know nothing about. The main characters feel unbelievably dull. And really that's about all there is, the movie falls very short in the characters department, and as well as the plot. It moves way to fast. Just go read the book. It's a masterpiece in contrast with this dull movie.

Anna W (mx) wrote: got told off for laughing too loudly in the cinema.how can you laugh too loudly?

Lauren S (ru) wrote: A poor followup to the original classic.

Andrew S (au) wrote: Really good horror movie I enjoyed it a lot even though it was kind of long.

F B (au) wrote: Awful boring film. Nearly drove me to suicide watching it. If you struggle getting to sleep, watch this and you'll be asleep in minutes.