Ziegfeld Follies

Ziegfeld Follies

The late, great impresario Florenz Ziegfeld looks down from heaven and ordains a new revue in his grand old style.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:110 minutes
  • Release:1945
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:ballet,   dance,   dancer,  

The late, great impresario Florenz Ziegfeld looks down from heaven and ordains a new revue in his grand old style. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Ziegfeld Follies torrent reviews

Andrew U (es) wrote: This is the new film that came out last year about cars that probably no one has heard of but it was something I watched with my brother who like this movie. I have to say that it was a terrible movie that had very bad acting, bad dialogue, and a very stupid plot. The only good part where the cars and it did nothing to help the movie. I don't even now how my brother even enjoy this film because he loves racing movies but this is nothing close to fast and the furious. It was terrible waste of money.

Richard G (au) wrote: It's too bad that today's overuse of flashing blue light, moving/shaky camera and penchant for action for action's sake has so ruined any critique of thoughtful movie making. I highly recommend this movie; sure it's a slow mover, but its a solid flick with solid acting.

Robert I (ru) wrote: So I watch lots of direct to video garbage, so I know what I'm talking about when I say this is actually better than most of the cheaply made horror crap. The quality is just that much higher. Specifically the sound editing, which is pretty good and better than most direct to video movies you've never heard of.Now, that disclaimer out of the way, I know this film isn't perfect, but let's look at the positives: The cast has some highlights with Kaley Cucuo, Judge Reinhold, Eileen Brennan, and Stacy Keach. Good to see familiar faces in a movie that normally is padded out with no namers.The main thing I liked about this film is that it felt like a PG-13 extended episode of "Are You Afraid of the Dark?". The tale is your typical Halloween fair: It's Halloween and the descendant of Ichabod Crane is haunted by his family's nemesis for a final showdown. But to spice things up we get some light cussing (no f-bombs, but some s-words and b-words) and lots of sex jokes/references. There's no overt sex (There's a brief nip slip, but that's all you ghouls are going to get), in fact, I'm surprised this got an R-rating, it's clearly a PG-13 at the most... There's a body count and the film shows some blood, not on par with other horror films, but enough to keep it out of the TV-rating range.I was entertained. A fun, brief (hour twenty run time) Halloween movie tale. As we are amping up to Halloween, this is a perfect warm up movie toward the beginning of the countdown.Uh, the bad? It is straightforward. There's not a lot to overly complicate it, but also nothing much to make it stand out. There's a few plot holes if you think about the film... which we are all best not to do. Nothing too bad that would make me give it a lesser rating however. A solid better than average!

dan s (es) wrote: No bad for a bunch of "never-heard-of's". I thought it was a bit on the dark side (lighting-wise) and a little on the trying to hard to be a seriously good movie for someone who is just starting in the movie business. After just having watched No Country For Old Men, this was a welcome relief. Almost a remake of Ghost Ship with a military twist on it. It was OK but not something I would go looking for to rent.

NoOne S (ag) wrote: I Love Me Some Alyson Stoner. She Made it a 3 star movie, had it been anyone else, I'd have not even bothered...

Wade B (mx) wrote: Stunning. Riedelsheimer's film is at least as good as Goldsworthy's constructions, though they become so interdependent that it's hard to determine where one leaves off and the other begins. First viewing, just let it run over you in real time as an extremely good documentary of Goldsworthy's art, much of which is as transient as an individual film frame. Second viewing, take your time, try to figure out how Riedelsheimer DID some of these shots. There's one scene where the camera flies down a creek like a radio-controlled toy helicopter, swooping close to the rocks, just above the water. In another, the camera suddenly cranes up and swivels to look directly down into one of Goldsworthy's scuptures ... but this appears to take place far from the nearest road. Camera moves usually done in a well-equipped studio take place on a sandy Nova Scotia beach or down a rocky Scottish stream. And watch the light, sunlight making the ice scuptures glow or rimming the edge of a stone wall. Whew!

David H (br) wrote: Though this movie has some serious flaws (wonky storytelling), I've watched this movie several times and still enjoy it. After seeing some documentaries on the Wonderland killings, this is easily one of the most truthful films following the incident and documenting Holmes's slippery personality. An interesting film that is worth watching, despite the critical panning. Give it a chance; it's a good crime film, if flawed in certain ways.

Mr Mrs D (mx) wrote: I went into this thing with my eyes open and now I'm seeing nothin' but stars.

Louise D (fr) wrote: A really beautiful film set in a wonderful location. Typically Malle- challenging and thought provoking- don't watch if you don't like being challenged!

Camille L (ag) wrote: Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid est un film avec une idee tres interessante (celle d'utiliser des vraies scenes de films noirs des annes 40's pour creer une histoire) qui entrave malheureusement le talent comique de Steve Martin, qui montre pourtant qu'il est un excellent acteur. Le film, techniquement irreprochable, est un peu long et tourne un peu en rond.

Tyler A (jp) wrote: cheese with an extra slice last 30mins allright